- Discuss how your learning style has contributed to your academic success. How can you utilize this style, or what strategies have you already implemented, when completing your personalized study plan? I don’t want my paper to have a plagiarism. I also need 2 replies. my main discussion is on Wednesday. I’ll take a picture to my classmates discussions and send it to you. It is due tomorrow at 11:59 pm Pacific time.
- GE Standardized Rubric: Discussion Board – (25 points)
GE Standardized Rubric: Discussion Board – (25 points) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Responses 11.25 ptsExceeds ExpectationsThe initial post applies course content sufficiently by expanding on the main points of the prompt; responses exhibit critical thinking and analysis. 10.01 ptsMeets ExpectationsContent knowledge is exhibited by identification of the main topics; there is some evidence of critical thinking and analysis, but responses may be insufficient or lacking in detail. 8.1 ptsApproaches ExpectationsUnderstanding of content knowledge is poorly exhibited and insufficient in critical thinking, analysis, and detail. Some main discussion topics are not covered or significantly digress from the topic at hand. 6.64 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsInitial response is missing or provides no indication of understanding. Main topics are not covered. 11.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReponses to Peers and Instructors 10 ptsExceeds ExpectationsReplies to peers and instructors are well developed and insightful, and provide an opportunity for response. Responses promote a discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making meaningful connections with course content, asking meaningful questions, or challenging viewpoints. 8.9 ptsMeets ExpectationsReplies to peers and instructors are mostly developed and provide an opportunity for response. Responses contribute to the discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making connections with course content, or asking questions. 7.2 ptsApproaches ExpectationsSome replies to peers and instructors are missing or poorly developed and provide little or no opportunity for response. Responses do little to contribute to the discussion. 5.9 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsNo responses to peers or instructors are presented AND/OR one word responses are provided. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 1.25 ptsExceeds ExpectationsWritten in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately referenced and cited in current APA style when applicable. 1.11 ptsMeets ExpectationsWriting is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style. 0.9 ptsApproaches ExpectationsWriting is generally unclear and unorganized. Several errors in spelling and grammar. Information from sources is missing or improperly cited. 0.74 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsErrors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, AND/OR writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse. 1.25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation 2.5 ptsExceeds ExpectationsExceeds the minimum number of initial postings and replies to peers and instructors. 2.23 ptsMeets ExpectationsMeets the minimum amount of initial posts and replies to peers and instructors. 1.8 ptsApproaches ExpectationsProvided significantly less than the minimum amount of initial posts and replies to peers and instructors. 1.48 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThere was little to no evidence of active participation in the discussion board, initial postings and/or replies to peers and instructors. 2.5 pts Total Points: 25