Your Perfect Assignment is Just a Click Away

We Write Custom Academic Papers

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Customized to your instructions!


University of South Florida Psychology Pupillary Contagion Questions

University of South Florida Psychology Pupillary Contagion Questions


  • One popular line of research in psychology today is the attempt to find physiological indicators of humans’ apparent need to be social with each other. As you’ve probably noticed on some level in your life, some animals are more prosocial than others; that is, some animals seek out company (e.g. dogs and cats), whereas others avoid it (e.g. most types of snakes). This article is about pupillary contagion. The first two paragraphs give you the definition of the term, and list at least five different ways in which pupillary contagion shows evidence of socialization among adults. How do the authors of the article define the term pupillary contagion? Explain at least three of the pieces of evidence of socialization cited in the first two paragraphs of the article.
  • The second part of the introduction gives the authors’ rationale for believing that even infants might show pupillary contagion. Pick two of the pieces of evidence offered by the authors that you find most compelling. Which two did you pick? What makes you think these are the most compelling pieces of evidence?
  • The Results section of a scientific paper can often be difficult to read, unless you’ve already had multiple classes on research methods and statistics. Yet not everything in the section is written in technical terms. For instance, the authors note in more than one place in the paper that the infants showed pupillary contagion for the round stimuli, but not for the squares. Look at the bar graph on page 1000, the red bar shows the average increase in pupil size, with the “whiskers” of the bar (the line centered on the top of the red bar, with a T shape at the top and bottom) showing variability. The fact that these “whiskers do not include the value of 0.00 on the figure shows that the participants were reliably enlarging their pupils. The authors claim that the square stimuli did nothing to pupils. But look at that blue bar, including its whiskers. Did the square stimuli do something? Explain your reasoning.
  • The Discussion section of the paper explains the results using plain language, rather than statistics. What did the authors conclude about pupillary contagion for 6- and 9-month olds, and what two alternative explanations do the authors give for this result?
  • The Discussion section of a paper should also include the limitations of the studies in that paper. In scientific terms, limitations are best thought of as weaknesses of the paper. Examples include doing a study only on college students, when we’re hoping to generalize the results to people of all ages and levels of education, or not treating all the participants in the study in the same way. What is not required in the limitations section of the paper is how the researchers choose to characterize those weaknesses: do the authors just admit to the weaknesses, or do they try to make excuses for the weaknesses?

    For this question, tell me the weaknesses the authors report for their paper. Do they offer a justification for each one? Do you think any justifications the authors offer are plausible or not? Explain your reasoning.

  • Order Solution Now

    Our Service Charter

    1. Professional & Expert Writers: Writers Hero only hires the best. Our writers are specially selected and recruited, after which they undergo further training to perfect their skills for specialization purposes. Moreover, our writers are holders of masters and Ph.D. degrees. They have impressive academic records, besides being native English speakers.

    2. Top Quality Papers: Our customers are always guaranteed of papers that exceed their expectations. All our writers have +5 years of experience. This implies that all papers are written by individuals who are experts in their fields. In addition, the quality team reviews all the papers before sending them to the customers.

    3. Plagiarism-Free Papers: All papers provided by Writers Hero are written from scratch. Appropriate referencing and citation of key information are followed. Plagiarism checkers are used by the Quality assurance team and our editors just to double-check that there are no instances of plagiarism.

    4. Timely Delivery: Time wasted is equivalent to a failed dedication and commitment. Writers Hero is known for timely delivery of any pending customer orders. Customers are well informed of the progress of their papers to ensure they keep track of what the writer is providing before the final draft is sent for grading.

    5. Affordable Prices: Our prices are fairly structured to fit in all groups. Any customer willing to place their assignments with us can do so at very affordable prices. In addition, our customers enjoy regular discounts and bonuses.

    6. 24/7 Customer Support: At Writers hero, we have put in place a team of experts who answer to all customer inquiries promptly. The best part is the ever-availability of the team. Customers can make inquiries anytime.